Why is
growth necessary for business survival.?
It is one of the great business truths that it
is very difficult, probably impossible, to maintain a business revenues and
costs at a constant level. There is always erosion of revenues that is rarely
mirrored by a reduction in costs. So standing still is not an option unless
oblivion is part of the plan.
The erosion
of revenues is caused by a variety of reasons, one of them being the loss of
customers or low customer loyalty. I recently came across again a piece of old research
about why customers defect from an organisation which, whether absolutely
correct or not, brings into focus the hard edged commercial value of loyalty.
- 1% Die- 4% Move Away
- 5% Friendship Links
- 10% Competitor Activities
- 12% Product Dissatisfaction
- 68% Indifferent Service Performance
These can be
subdivided generally into two groups .
Uncontrollable
Customer Loss and Controllable Customer Loss.
The first 4
factors (20% ) are more or less uncontrollable. Those that die definitely will
not buy much in the future and the others are difficult to manage on a
strategic basis. This indicates that an organisation with a customer churn of
20% is likely to have to replace 4% of its revenue simply to maintain the
status quo. However. if it does not pay attention to the Controllable Factors
(80%) then another 16% of its revenue is at risk and at that rate it is not
difficult to see how rapidly oblivion could arrive. Yet it is very rare to find
an organisation whose sales or growth plan includes an element that addresses
the controllable loss issue. The sales focus usually is very heavily on new
business, new sales to new customers. Whereas repeat/additional sales to
existing customers (loyalty) figures less prominently. So if the major strategic growth plan abandons
the controllable 16% of revenue that is
at risk by not addressing its root cause, poor product and service performance,
and sets sales off to replace the whole 20% necessary to get the revenue level
required to stand still is this the most sensible approach?
If the
controllable losses could be entirely eliminated the same sales effort and
energy would produce 16% revenue growth, or alternatively the sales costs required
to maintain the status quo could be reduced. There is of course a cost to
resolving the controllable loss issue but that is usually more of an investment
in improved product, premises, process and people performance which when done
remains a permanent on-going performance improvement and competitive benefit to
the organisation likely to yield protection from controllable losses in the future
Depending on
the sector in question It is possible to produce simple or very complicated
mathematical models to justify an investment
in loyalty as a sensible business strategy to substantially reduce the
sales effort required to achieve a given growth objective.
Many markets
are still in uncertain economic times so would it be better to resolve the loss
of revenue caused by poor service performance and thereby enable the
organisation to focus its sales effort on getting the number and kind of customers
it needs to achieve it growth objectives rather than having to chase the need to get as
many customers as it can simply to replace lost revenue?
Many
organisations manage sales and loyalty within different functions which raises the question
that if growth optimisation is dependent on maximising the combined effect of
loyalty and sales are organisations structured in a way that gives them the
best opportunity to grow revenue?
Philip Forrest
Different methods should be looked upon for a successful month on sales.
ReplyDelete