There are a
couple of incidents that have been recently reported to me that made me ask the question “What could have been done
better”
A group of foreign
visiting golfers were playing at The Molle Golf Club in Sweden, the weather had
been wet but on the day it could not have been better with a cool bright start
turning into a lovely sunny day.
The visitors
all hired trolleys which were the new three wheeled push type. The course is
spectacular but a little hilly and after a few holes one of the golfers was
feeling warm and removed his sweater, which happened to be pale blue cashmere,
and placed it in a small basket situated below the push handle.
A couple of
holes later in order to get to the next tee it was necessary to push the
trolley up a very steep slope, as the golfer did this a large quantity of
filthy black liquid came out of the joint in the handle and poured over the
sweater leaving it badly marked and stained.
On getting
back to the pro shop, the golfer complained and showed them the sweater. The
assistant said that
a. They were aware that the trolley
frame was liable to fill with water when it rained and create an unpleasant
residue which could spill out
b. They told the golfer that he should
not have put his sweater in the basket
The golfer
asked what they proposed to do about the situation.
They advised
him they would attempt to wash the sweater. He pointed out that they had to
leave after the game to get to their next destination 3 hours away. The answer was a shrug.
What could
they have done better? If you were in
charge of the pro-shop what would you have done? Is a visitor customer any less important?
What were the lost opportunities? Will their action prevent a recurrence?
In another
incident a group of eight friends were staying at a country hotel on the East
Coast of Suffolk in the UK. After
returning to the hotel from a local visit they were asked if they would like to
book a table for dinner. As the restaurant had a good reputation they confirmed
they would and were asked what time they would like and they selected 8pm. They
arrived at the restaurant to find it almost full with a large group of over 20
behaving in a fairly loud manner with the one waiter and waitress clearly
struggling to keep up with their needs.
It took half an hour before the orders for
starters were taken from the group of eight and their whole meal took over
three hours to serve as the large group clearly was taking precedence. A couple
of very measured complaints to the waiting staff during that period produced no
results.
The following morning on check out the
manageress enquired if everything had been satisfactory, she was given the bad
news by one of the guests in the form of some carefully structured feedback
about the service at dinner. Her response was that she had no idea it had happened,
apologised and added she hoped it would not influence their decision about
staying with them again. . Nothing more.
There seem
to be some process management and
communication opportunities lost here
What could
they have done better? If you were in
the hotel owner would you be confident that you would get to know about such
incidents? What were the missed process
management and communication opportunities. What could be done to prevent a
recurrence?
To conclude
another thought. I have just been
reading another book on managing the customer experience and observed that this
book, like many of its kind, make a number of references of the kind that say “When you next have to persuade your boss
that it is worth investing in customer ……………..then show him this or tell him
that”
This seems
to imply two things. Firstly that the book is not written for business leaders
but is aimed at middle management in order to arm them in their relentless
struggle for customer experience improvement in an environment that is hostile
to the concept. Secondly that all bosses are unable to read such books
themselves and are too stupid and over focused on other priorities to be able
to recognise the importance of the role of customers in their organisational
success equation.
Could it be that
all bosses are that stupid or is that the authors have an unrealistic picture
of the world?
Philip Forrest
No comments:
Post a Comment